<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something For Nothing: Part 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/</link>
	<description>Original Wordpress Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Themey</title>
		<link>http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Themey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Hi Terri

Thanks for sharing your point of view. Do you feel that it would be wrong for Happy Travel to publish the theme with their link in the footer - would you consider it spamming - or do you think it is OK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terri</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your point of view. Do you feel that it would be wrong for Happy Travel to publish the theme with their link in the footer &#8211; would you consider it spamming &#8211; or do you think it is OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themey.com/something-for-nothing-part-5/#comment-602</guid>
		<description>For the most part, it would be generally accepted that the travel company would get the link back, since they paid for, and therefore own the rights to, the website design.

That could depend on the wording of the contract. If the travel company were not savvy to the ways of the web (highly likely) and the web design company is savvy (probably), the web design company would realize the value of the link back and possibly write into the contract that the web design was for purpose of the travel company to create an online presence. In otherwords, they would not be able to benefit from the distribution of the design.

Tom Thumb would most likely not benefit in any way since he works for the web design company and is paid for his work, which would therefore be the property of the web design company.

Peace,
Terri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, it would be generally accepted that the travel company would get the link back, since they paid for, and therefore own the rights to, the website design.</p>
<p>That could depend on the wording of the contract. If the travel company were not savvy to the ways of the web (highly likely) and the web design company is savvy (probably), the web design company would realize the value of the link back and possibly write into the contract that the web design was for purpose of the travel company to create an online presence. In otherwords, they would not be able to benefit from the distribution of the design.</p>
<p>Tom Thumb would most likely not benefit in any way since he works for the web design company and is paid for his work, which would therefore be the property of the web design company.</p>
<p>Peace,<br />
Terri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

